HYDROLOGIC OUTLOOK NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE RIVERTON WY 1004 AM MDT TUE MAY 31 2016 ...Western and central Wyoming rivers expected to peak early next week in response to accelerated snowmelt runoff by this weekend... Snowmelt runoff will continue to increase this week and is expected to greatly accelerate by this weekend. Afternoon temperatures at the 9500 foot elevation are expected to be in the upper 50s to lower 60s Friday through Sunday. Morning low temperatures will be at or above the frost temperatures both on Saturday and Sunday. Smaller creeks and streams will be running near bankfull conditions by Sunday morning with main stem rivers running at moderate to high levels by early next week. Minor flooding along small streams and creeks may occur over low lying areas and near creek and stream confluence locations. The Little Wind River near Riverton is expected to peak near flood stage by Monday afternoon. The Big Wind River at Riverton is forecasted to crest near flood stage by early Tuesday morning. Avoid crossing mountain creeks and streams in the late afternoon through early evening hours as the water levels are the highest during that time. Keep small children away from the banks of high flowing creeks and streams as they can be quickly washed away. Graphical forecasts are available at: http://water.weather.gov/ahps2/index.php?wfo=riw Visit weather.gov/riverton and select the rivers & lakes tab for graphical forecasts and additional information.
A BLOG ABOUT WEATHER FORECASTING AND OBSERVING AS IT RELATES TO STAR VALLEY, WYOMING IN PARTICULAR
Tuesday, May 31, 2016
Peak Snow Melt Runoff Just Ahead
Thursday, May 26, 2016
Web Cam Site Up
The web camera site is back and running better than ever thanks to John Hales-webmaster extraordinaire
Wednesday, May 25, 2016
RAINFALL AMOUNTS OVER THE LAST 24 HOURS
Public Information Statement National Weather Service Riverton WY 1021 AM MDT Wed May 25 2016 A STRONG PACIFIC COLD FRONT TRACKED ACROSS WESTERN AND CENTRAL WYOMING ON TUESDAY MAY 24TH. SHOWERS AND THUNDERSTOMS ERUPTED IN ITS WAKE. SOME AREAS RECEIVED SUBSTANTIAL RAINFALL FROM TEHSE SHOWERS ALONG WITH SOME SNOWFALL AT THE HIGHEST ELEVATIONS. THE FOLLOWING ARE A COLLECTION OF RAINFALL AMOUNTS OVER THE LAST 24 HOURS AROUND THE AREA. ...Rainfall Reports... Location Amount Time/Date Elevation ...Wyoming...
...Lincoln County... 1 S Bedford 0.61 in 0956 AM 05/25 6279 Ft. Bedford - Coop 0.48 in 0700 AM 05/25 6425 Ft. 4 NE Thayne 0.44 in 1004 AM 05/25 6217 Ft. Afton 0.43 in 1003 AM 05/25 6267 Ft. 3 NW Etna 0.39 in 0930 AM 05/25 5676 Ft. 1 NW Afton 0.36 in 0900 AM 05/25 6211 Ft. Afton 0.36 in 0700 AM 05/25 6234 Ft. 3 E Freedom 0.31 in 1800 PM 05/24 6030 Ft. Etna 0.27 in 1004 AM 05/25 5823 Ft. Smiths Fork Near Border 0.23 in 0930 AM 05/25 6650 Ft. 2 SE Thayne 0.22 in 0700 AM 05/25 6086 Ft. 12 WSW Calpet 0.18 in 0906 AM 05/25 8638 Ft. Thayne 0.17 in 1001 AM 05/25 5928 Ft. 15 NE Cokeville 0.16 in 1000 AM 05/25 8470 Ft. Kemmerer 0.11 in 1000 AM 05/25 6980 Ft. Cokeville 0.10 in 1000 AM 05/25 6191 Ft....Washakie County... Winchester 0.40 in 0730 AM 05/25 4216 Ft. Worland 0.40 in 0800 AM 05/25 4058 Ft. 12 ENE Ten Sleep 0.35 in 0914 AM 05/25 8202 Ft. Worland Airport 0.29 in 0553 AM 05/25 4245 Ft. 2 NE Worland 0.24 in 0659 AM 05/25 4089 Ft. 8 SW Worland 0.23 in 0700 AM 05/25 4136 Ft. 15 SSW Big Trails 0.12 in 0940 AM 05/25 6554 Ft. Tensleep 0.12 in 0700 AM 05/25 4680 Ft. ...Teton County... 17 N Alta 0.81 in 1003 AM 05/25 6830 Ft. Lake Village 0.73 in 1000 AM 05/25 7875 Ft. 4 W South Entrance Ynp 0.63 in 0945 AM 05/25 7040 Ft. Old Faithful 0.57 in 0915 AM 05/25 7320 Ft. South Entrance Ynp 0.51 in 0945 AM 05/25 6900 Ft. Lake Yellowstone 0.43 in 0556 AM 05/25 7835 Ft. Jackson - Coop 0.36 in 0900 AM 05/25 6210 Ft. Jackson 0.36 in 0945 AM 05/25 6240 Ft. 3 SSW Jackson 0.34 in 1012 AM 05/25 6158 Ft. Snake River Ranger Station 0.33 in 0800 AM 05/25 6882 Ft. Snake River At Jackson Lake 0.32 in 0945 AM 05/25 6779 Ft. 4 SW Jackson 0.30 in 1013 AM 05/25 6073 Ft. Moran 0.28 in 0800 AM 05/25 6800 Ft. Moose - Coop 0.22 in 0800 AM 05/25 6445 Ft. Jackson Hole Airport 0.21 in 0555 AM 05/25 6445 Ft. 12 NE Jackson 0.21 in 0700 AM 05/25 6663 Ft. 4 N Moose 0.17 in 0958 AM 05/25 6730 Ft. 7 E Moran Jct 0.14 in 0952 AM 05/25 7251 Ft. 2ne Teton Village 0.11 in 0700 AM 05/25 6339 Ft. Alta 0.10 in 0945 AM 05/25 6430 Ft. ...Sublette County... Pine Creek Above Fremont Lak 0.96 in 1845 PM 05/24 7480 Ft. 9 E Big Piney 0.33 in 1000 AM 05/25 6803 Ft. Bondurant 0.30 in 1000 AM 05/25 6650 Ft. Pinedale 0.23 in 1000 AM 05/25 7310 Ft. Boulder Lake 0.22 in 1000 AM 05/25 7350 Ft. 7 NE Pinedale 0.22 in 0926 AM 05/25 8530 Ft. Marbleton 0.21 in 0957 AM 05/25 6896 Ft. 2 NW Bondurant 0.20 in 0951 AM 05/25 6726 Ft. Big Piney Airport 0.15 in 0553 AM 05/25 6974 Ft. 21 W Big Piney 0.15 in 0909 AM 05/25 8200 Ft. 14 NW Pinedale 0.13 in 0600 AM 05/25 7469 Ft. ...Park County... Lake Yellowstone 0.43 in 0637 AM 05/25 7875 Ft. Ne Entrance Yellowstone 0.29 in 0845 AM 05/25 7360 Ft. 1 SW Canyon 0.23 in 0949 AM 05/25 7900 Ft. Lamar Ranger Station 0.23 in 0818 AM 05/25 6555 Ft. 5 WNW Clark 0.19 in 1001 AM 05/25 4659 Ft. East Entrance Yellowstone Np 0.16 in 0705 AM 05/25 6951 Ft. 3 E Pahaska 0.14 in 0957 AM 05/25 7500 Ft. 6 ENE Sunlight Basin 0.13 in 0956 AM 05/25 6300 Ft. Crandall 0.12 in 0912 AM 05/25 6640 Ft. 1 W Clark 0.12 in 1008 AM 05/25 4270 Ft. Meeteetse 0.11 in 1004 AM 05/25 5797 Ft. 3 E Wapiti 0.10 in 0915 AM 05/25 5400 Ft. 10 WNW Cody 0.10 in 0940 AM 05/25 8401 Ft. 4 ENE Powell 0.10 in 0700 AM 05/25 4288 Ft. Cody 0.10 in 0700 AM 05/25 5088 Ft. ...Johnson County... 17 E Kaycee 0.40 in 0915 AM 05/25 4362 Ft. 8 S Story 0.39 in 0915 AM 05/25 5279 Ft. 20 NW Mayoworth 0.35 in 1000 AM 05/25 8180 Ft. 7 WSW Buffalo 0.35 in 1000 AM 05/25 5745 Ft. 7 NE Buffalo 0.32 in 1003 AM 05/25 4370 Ft. 18 NW Buffalo 0.32 in 0947 AM 05/25 8604 Ft. 14 W Buffalo 0.20 in 0915 AM 05/25 8400 Ft. Buffalo Airport 0.11 in 0553 AM 05/25 4970 Ft. Kaycee 17 NNW 0.11 in 0700 AM 05/25 5071 Ft. ...Hot Springs County... Thermopolis 9 NE 0.63 in 0700 AM 05/25 4280 Ft. Kirby 0.61 in 0958 AM 05/25 4350 Ft. 3 NE Thermopolis 0.19 in 0700 AM 05/25 4326 Ft. 10 S Meeteetse 0.10 in 0942 AM 05/25 7127 Ft. ...Fremont County... 11 W Crowheart 0.22 in 0945 AM 05/25 6520 Ft. 10 W Dubois 0.12 in 1013 AM 05/25 8432 Ft. 9 SSE Lander 0.12 in 0700 AM 05/25 5818 Ft. 19 WSW Dubois 0.10 in 0910 AM 05/25 8833 Ft. ...Big Horn County... 5 ENE Hyattville 0.30 in 0952 AM 05/25 5670 Ft. 9 ENE Greybull 0.11 in 0530 AM 05/25 4205 Ft. Observations are collected from a variety of sources with varying equipment and exposures. Not all data listed are considered official.
Monday, May 23, 2016
Web Camera Site Down
There is a problem with the provider for our Web Camera Site. Hopefully it will be up soon. This is the most serious down period in the about 7 years of the site.
Saturday, May 21, 2016
24 Hour Rainfall Reports ending at 600 AM MDT from Western and Northern Wyoming
Public Information Statement National Weather Service Riverton WY 630 AM MDT Sat May 21 2016 ...Here are 24 Hour Rainfall Reports ending at 600 AM MDT from Western and Northern Wyoming where showers and thunderstorms occurred Friday and Friday night... Location Amount Elevation...Star Valley... 3 NW Etna 0.45 in 5676 Ft. Etna 0.30 in 5823 Ft. 3 NW Etna 0.26 in 5692 Ft. 1 S Bedford 0.23 in 6279 Ft. 4 NE Thayne 0.20 in 6217 Ft. 1 NW Afton 0.17 in 6211 Ft. Thayne 0.16 in 5928 Ft. Afton 0.05 in 6267 Ft. ...South Lincoln County... Cokeville 0.15 in 6191 Ft. 9 N Kemmerer 0.03 in 7129 Ft. Kemmerer 0.02 in 6980 Ft. ...Salt River and Wyoming Ranges... 21 W Big Piney 0.82 in 8200 Ft. 15 NE Cokeville 0.61 in 8470 Ft. 12 WSW Calpet 0.23 in 8638 Ft. Smiths Fork Near Border 0.01 in 6650 Ft....Yellowstone National Park... 1 SW Canyon 0.32 in 7900 Ft. 4 W South Entrance YNP 0.32 in 7040 Ft. 15 WSW Mammoth 0.31 in 7900 Ft. Lake Yellowstone 0.23 in 7835 Ft. East Entrance YNP 0.20 in 6951 Ft. South Entrance YNP 0.20 in 6900 Ft. Old Faithful 0.19 in 7320 Ft. Lake Village 0.16 in 7875 Ft. Tower Falls 0.14 in 6266 Ft. Hoyt Peak 0.11 in 9800 Ft. Mammoth 0.09 in 6300 Ft. Gardner River Nr Mammoth, 0.06 in 5624 Ft. ...Wind River Mountains West... Pine Creek Above Fremont Lake 1.05 in 7480 Ft. 19 WSW Dubois 0.33 in 8833 Ft. 7 NE Pinedale 0.15 in 8530 Ft. 8 W South Pass City 0.06 in 8120 Ft. Boulder Lake 0.05 in 7350 Ft. 3 NNE South Pass City 0.04 in 8540 Ft. ...Wind River Mountains East... 10 WNW Dubois 0.21 in 8433 Ft. 10 W Dubois 0.08 in 8432 Ft. ...Upper Wind River Basin... 6 NW Dubois 0.07 in 7189 Ft. ...Upper Green River Basin... Farson - Coop 0.21 in 6675 Ft. 14 N Farson 0.15 in 6780 Ft. Marbleton 0.04 in 6896 Ft. 1 S Fontenelle Reservoir 0.01 in 6390 Ft. ...Upper Green River Basin Foothills... 7 SE Pinedale 0.54 in 7069 Ft. Bondurant 0.22 in 6650 Ft. 2 NW Bondurant 0.16 in 6726 Ft. Pinedale 0.08 in 7310 Ft. ...Teton and Gros Ventre Mountains... Portable Raws 0.90 in 6195 Ft. Alta - Coop 0.32 in 6435 Ft. 17 N Alta 0.22 in 6830 Ft. Alta 0.08 in 6430 Ft. ...Jackson Hole... Jackson Hole Airport 0.29 in 6445 Ft. Jackson 0.27 in 6240 Ft. 7 E Moran Jct 0.25 in 7251 Ft. Jackson 0.24 in 6247 Ft. 4 N Moose 0.19 in 6730 Ft. Snake River At Jackson Lake 0.17 in 6779 Ft. 4 SW Jackson 0.15 in 6073 Ft. 3 SSW Jackson 0.15 in 6158 Ft. Hoback Junction 0.10 in 5928 Ft. Moran Junction 0.07 in 6749 Ft. ...Cody Foothills... Cody Airport 0.93 in 5100 Ft. 3 E Wapiti 0.63 in 5400 Ft. 1 W Clark 0.36 in 4270 Ft. 3 SW Ralston 0.24 in 4575 Ft. 20 SW Cody 0.20 in 5843 Ft. 2 WSW Cody 0.18 in 5167 Ft. 5 WNW Clark 0.16 in 4659 Ft. Buffalo Bill Reservoir 0.05 in 5357 Ft. 6 SW Meeteetse 0.03 in 6238 Ft. Meeteetse 0.02 in 5797 Ft. ...Bighorn Mountains Southeast... 7 WSW Buffalo 0.24 in 5745 Ft. 14 W Buffalo 0.08 in 8400 Ft. 18 NW Buffalo 0.03 in 8604 Ft. ...Absaroka Mountains... 10 WNW Cody 1.22 in 8401 Ft. 19 SSW Wapiti 0.74 in 6200 Ft. 6 ENE Sunlight Basin 0.27 in 6300 Ft. NE Entrance Yellowstone NP 0.22 in 7360 Ft. Pahaska 0.17 in 6696 Ft. Crandall 0.06 in 6640 Ft. 3 E Pahaska 0.02 in 7500 Ft. 10 N Dubois 0.02 in 8085 Ft. Observations are collected from a variety of sources with varying equipment and exposures. Not all data listed are considered official.
Friday, May 20, 2016
2016 Will Be the Hottest Year on Record!
99 Percent Chance 2016 Will Be the Hottest Year on Record
The streak of record warm months continues, thanks to El Niño and global warming
- By Andrea Thompson, Climate Central on May 18, 2016
Odds are increasing that 2016 will be the hottest year on the books, as April continued a remarkable streak of record-warm months.
Last month was rated as the warmest April on record by both NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which released their data this week. In the temperature annals kept by NOAA, it marked the 12th record warmest month in a row.
Global temperatures have been hovering around 1.5°C (2.7°F) above pre-industrial averages—a threshold that’s being considered by international negotiators as a new goal for limiting warming.
While an exceptionally strong El Niño has provided a boost to temperatures in recent months, the primary driver has been the heat that has built up from decades of unabated greenhouse gas emissions.
NEARING 1.5°C
NOAA announced its temperature data for April on Wednesday, with the month measuring 1.98°F (1.1°C) above the 20th century average of 56.7°F (13.7°C). It was warmer than the previous record-hot April of 2010 by 0.5°F (0.3°C).
NASA’s data showed the month was about the same amount above the average from 1951-1980. The two agencies use different baselines and process the global temperature data slightly differently, leading to potential differences in the exact temperatures anomalies for each month and year.
Both agencies’ records show that global temperatures have come down slightly from the peaks they hit in February and March, which ranked as the most anomalously warm months by NASA and NOAA, respectively.
Climate Central has reanalyzed the temperature data from recent months, averaging the NASA and NOAA numbers and comparing it to the average from 1881-1910 to show how much temperatures have risen from a period closer to preindustrial times.
The analysis shows that the year-to-date temperature through April is 1.45°C above the average from that period. Governments have agreed to limit warming this century to less than 2°C from pre-industrial times and are exploring setting an even more ambitious goal of 1.5°C, which temperatures are currently close to.
“The fact that we are beginning to cross key thresholds at the monthly timescale is indeed an indication of how close we are getting to permanently exceeding those thresholds,” Michael Mann, a climate scientist at Penn State, said in an email.
It will take a significant effort to further limit emissions of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases to realize those goals, experts say. Carbon dioxide levels at the Mauna Loa observatory in Hawaii are already poised to stay above 400 parts per million year-round. They have risen from a pre-industrial level of 280 ppm and from 315 ppm just since the mid-20th century.
HOTTEST YEAR?
As El Niño continues to rapidly decay, monthly temperature anomalies are slowly declining. They are still considerably higher than they were just last year, the current title-holder for the hottest year on record.
Given the head start this year has over last, there is a more than 99 percent chance that 2016 will best 2015 as the hottest year on the books, according to Gavin Schmidt, head of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, which keeps the agencies temperature data.
If 2016 does set the mark, it will be the third record-setting year in a row.
It is likely, though, that the streak would end with this year, as a La Niña event is looking increasingly likely to follow El Niño, and it tends to have a cooling effect on global temperatures.
But even La Niña years today are warmer than El Niño years of previous decades—a clear sign of how much human caused-warming has increased global temperatures. In fact, the planet hasn’t seen a record cold year since 1911.
This article is reproduced with permission from Climate Central. The article was first published on May 18, 2016.
Monday, May 16, 2016
Repost of Star Valley Earthquake Potential
To go along with the previous posting of the dramatic increase in Earthquakes in Oklahoma and damage forecast for the 48 states, a reposting of the Earthquake blog of about 3 years ago is timely.
Star Valley Earthquake Potential
With the occurrence of the two weak earthquakes in the Star Valley area so far this year
http://starvalleywyweather.blogspot.com/2013/10/twin-earthquakes-jolt-star-valley.html
http://starvalleywyweather.blogspot.com/2013/05/earthquake-magnitude-lowered-to-36.html , it is a reminder that we live on, or very close, to an active fault.
While the chances of a major, damaging earthquake are low in any given year, nevertheless, it is just a matter of time before one does occur.
Following is a link to a paper discussing the location of fault lines in Lincoln County WY and the potential of a major quake.
http://www.wrds.uwyo.edu/wrds/wsgs/hazards/quakes/seischar/Lincoln.pdf
The following was taken from this paper as it describes the fault systems of Star Valley in particular.
The Star Valley fault system is the third active fault system in Lincoln County. This fault system,
which has been subdivided into north and south segments, bounds the eastern edge of the Star
Valley. Investigations of the Star Valley fault system determined that Holocene and late-
Pleistocene offsets exist along the south fault segment (Piety et al., 1986; McCalpin et al., 1990;
McCalpin, 1990). Several maximum magnitude earthquakes have been suggested for the Star
Valley fault system. Piety and others (1986) proposed that the Star Valley fault system is capable
of generating a maxiumum credible earthquake of magnitude 7.5 with a recurrence interval of
5,000 to 7,000 years. Based upon a surface rupture length of 27 miles, McCalpin and others
(1990) determined that the Star Valley fault system could produce a maximum magnitude 7.2
earthquake. When McCalpin (1990) trenched a portion of the Star Valley fault near Afton, he
determined that a magnitude 7.3 earthquake with a recurrence interval of 2550-6000 years is
possible on this system. Approximately 5,500 years (radiocarbon age) has elapsed since the latest
event on the fault system at the Afton locality. Based upon this evidence, the Star Valley fault
system is near the maximum limit for the recurrence interval assigned to the system. Because of
the extensive seismic activity associated with the area surrounding the Star Valley fault, and
because of the close proximity of towns to this fault system, a maximum magnitude of 7.5 will be
used for this analysis. It should also be noted that it has been approximately 5500 years since the
last confirmed event on the Star Valley fault at Afton. This fault system is therefore nearing its
recurrence interval limit. A magnitude 7.5 earthquake could generate peak horizontal
accelerations of greater than 80%g at Afton, approximately 79%g at Alpine, approximately
6.6%g at Cokeville, approximately 3.2%g at Kemmerer and Diamondville, approximately 5.2%g
at La Barge, approximately 2.9%g at Opal, and approximately 47%g at Thayne (Campbell, 1987).
These accelerations are roughly equivalent to intensity IX earthquakes at Afton and Alpine, an
intensity VIII earthquake at Thayne, intensity V earthquakes at Cokeville and La Barge, and
intensity IV earthquakes at Kemmerer, Diamondville, and Opal. Afton and Alpine could sustain
heavy damage. Moderate to heavy damage could occur at Thayne. Light damage could occur at
Cokeville and La Barge, but Kemmerer, Diamondville, and Opal should sustain no damage.
The following map shows where the fault lines in this portion of Wyoming have been located.
Based on the the known threat for a major earthquake in the Star Valley area, it seems prudent to factor this into any future construction. Additionally earthquake insurance might be considered.
Here is another link to a discussion of Wyoming Earthquake Hazards including Star Valley
Wyoming Earthquakes
http://starvalleywyweather.blogspot.com/2013/10/twin-earthquakes-jolt-star-valley.html
http://starvalleywyweather.blogspot.com/2013/05/earthquake-magnitude-lowered-to-36.html , it is a reminder that we live on, or very close, to an active fault.
While the chances of a major, damaging earthquake are low in any given year, nevertheless, it is just a matter of time before one does occur.
Following is a link to a paper discussing the location of fault lines in Lincoln County WY and the potential of a major quake.
http://www.wrds.uwyo.edu/wrds/wsgs/hazards/quakes/seischar/Lincoln.pdf
The following was taken from this paper as it describes the fault systems of Star Valley in particular.
The Star Valley fault system is the third active fault system in Lincoln County. This fault system,
which has been subdivided into north and south segments, bounds the eastern edge of the Star
Valley. Investigations of the Star Valley fault system determined that Holocene and late-
Pleistocene offsets exist along the south fault segment (Piety et al., 1986; McCalpin et al., 1990;
McCalpin, 1990). Several maximum magnitude earthquakes have been suggested for the Star
Valley fault system. Piety and others (1986) proposed that the Star Valley fault system is capable
of generating a maxiumum credible earthquake of magnitude 7.5 with a recurrence interval of
5,000 to 7,000 years. Based upon a surface rupture length of 27 miles, McCalpin and others
(1990) determined that the Star Valley fault system could produce a maximum magnitude 7.2
earthquake. When McCalpin (1990) trenched a portion of the Star Valley fault near Afton, he
determined that a magnitude 7.3 earthquake with a recurrence interval of 2550-6000 years is
possible on this system. Approximately 5,500 years (radiocarbon age) has elapsed since the latest
event on the fault system at the Afton locality. Based upon this evidence, the Star Valley fault
system is near the maximum limit for the recurrence interval assigned to the system. Because of
the extensive seismic activity associated with the area surrounding the Star Valley fault, and
because of the close proximity of towns to this fault system, a maximum magnitude of 7.5 will be
used for this analysis. It should also be noted that it has been approximately 5500 years since the
last confirmed event on the Star Valley fault at Afton. This fault system is therefore nearing its
recurrence interval limit. A magnitude 7.5 earthquake could generate peak horizontal
accelerations of greater than 80%g at Afton, approximately 79%g at Alpine, approximately
6.6%g at Cokeville, approximately 3.2%g at Kemmerer and Diamondville, approximately 5.2%g
at La Barge, approximately 2.9%g at Opal, and approximately 47%g at Thayne (Campbell, 1987).
These accelerations are roughly equivalent to intensity IX earthquakes at Afton and Alpine, an
intensity VIII earthquake at Thayne, intensity V earthquakes at Cokeville and La Barge, and
intensity IV earthquakes at Kemmerer, Diamondville, and Opal. Afton and Alpine could sustain
heavy damage. Moderate to heavy damage could occur at Thayne. Light damage could occur at
Cokeville and La Barge, but Kemmerer, Diamondville, and Opal should sustain no damage.
The following map shows where the fault lines in this portion of Wyoming have been located.
Fault Line Locations |
Based on the the known threat for a major earthquake in the Star Valley area, it seems prudent to factor this into any future construction. Additionally earthquake insurance might be considered.
Here is another link to a discussion of Wyoming Earthquake Hazards including Star Valley
Wyoming Earthquakes
Earthquake Damage Threat Forecast for 2016
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has produced a 1-year seismic hazard forecast for 2016 for the Central and Eastern United States (CEUS) that includes contributions from both induced and natural earthquakes. The model assumes that earthquake rates calculated from several different time windows will remain relatively stationary and can be used to forecast earthquake hazard and damage intensity for the year 2016. This assessment is the first step in developing an operational earthquake forecast for the CEUS, and the analysis could be revised with updated seismicity and model parameters. Consensus input models consider alternative earthquake catalog durations, smoothing parameters, maximum magnitudes, and ground motion estimates, and represent uncertainties in earthquake occurrence and diversity of opinion in the science community.
Ground shaking seismic hazard for 1-percent probability of exceedance in 1 year reaches 0.6 g (as a fraction of standard gravity [g]) in northern Oklahoma and southern Kansas, and about 0.2 g in the Raton Basin of Colorado and New Mexico, in central Arkansas, and in north-central Texas near Dallas. Near some areas of active induced earthquakes, hazard is higher than in the 2014 USGS National Seismic Hazard Model (NHSM) by more than a factor of 3; the 2014 NHSM did not consider induced earthquakes. In some areas, previously observed induced earthquakes have stopped, so the seismic hazard reverts back to the 2014 NSHM. Increased seismic activity, whether defined as induced or natural, produces high hazard. Conversion of ground shaking to seismic intensity indicates that some places in Oklahoma, Kansas, Colorado, New Mexico, Texas, and Arkansas may experience damage if the induced seismicity continues unabated. The chance of having Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) VI or greater (damaging earthquake shaking) is 5–12 percent per year in north-central Oklahoma and southern Kansas, similar to the chance of damage caused by natural earthquakes at sites in parts of California.
Sunday, May 15, 2016
Remembering the Willow Creek Down burst of June 6 2010
Springtime is when down burst potential becomes a significant severe weather concern across the Intermountain Region including Star Valley. Thus I have reposted a blog from 3 years ago about the major down burst that struck Willow Creek in 2010
Three Years Later (June 6 2010)
A map below indicates ground zero for the downburst.
Following are several photos taken on June 6th 2013, 3 years later, of the obvious evidence of the power of the winds near the A Marker.
Google Maps Image 2009- pre-blowdown |
Post-blowdown from BING maps |
Additional Post-Blowdown from BING maps |
Also a photo was taken looking north from Star Valley Ranch as the storm was moving by, which was not toward the most intense portion .
On examination of the Pocatello radar data of the storm it was undoubtedly a Supercell. While tornados are associated with Supercells, in this case there is no evidence of any tornadic circulation. The storm was moving at close to 60mph and as the following radar images of the storm will attest, it was very impressive.
The first image shows a vertical radar cross-section with a very strong and high reflectivity core to above 30,000 feet and overall storm top to above 50,000 feet as it was approaching the Wyoming/Idaho line.
Pocatello Doppler Radar 7:19 PM June 6 2010 |
Pocatello Doppler Radar 7:19 PM June 6 2010 |
The following is the Vertically Integrated Liquid(VIL) which displays the area of greatest large hail potential.
Pocatello Doppler Radar VIL 7:19 PM June 6, 2010 |
Pocatello Doppler Storm Relative Velocity 7:06 PM June 6, 2010 |
While a tornado could not be ruled out with a storm of this intensity, the character of the storm and wind fall of the trees, all up-canyon, a downburst with speeds possibly to 80 mph or more was the likely culprit of the observed damage.
Thursday, May 12, 2016
NOAA's Weather Model Upgrade
NOAA’s premier forecast model goes 4-D
May 11, 2016NOAA’s powerful new supercomputers paved the way for another upgrade to the U.S. Global Forecast System (GFS), NOAA’s primary model for weather prediction.
Today’s upgrade builds on last year’s significant boost to the GFS, which more than doubled the resolution of the model grid from 27 kilometers to 13 kilometers, resulting in higher resolution model output and more preciseweather forecasts and warnings.
Today’s shift to 4-D ensemble hybrid data assimilation takes into account how weather systems evolve on a 3-D spatial grid over time, with time now becoming the fourth dimension. This approach makes better use of earth observations used to initialize the model which gives forecasters a more accurate and timely picture of evolving weather situations.
“The GFS is the foundation for all of our weather and climate models, so today’s upgrade will add skill across all NOAA's forecast mission areas, including hurricanes and other high-impact weather,” said Louis Uccellini, Ph.D., director of NOAA’s National Weather Service. “Current investments in more powerful supercomputers, advanced modeling capabilities, and better earth observing systems are creating more precision in the forecast process and strengthening America's resiliency to extreme weather, water and climate events."
Uccellini added that this GFS upgrade is the latest of a number of model improvements rolling out this spring and summer, thanks to increased supercomputing power NOAA acquired earlier this year. "America's needs for weather, climate, and water information and prediction are growing, and we're advancing our capabilities to meet current and future demand," he said.
The GFS model is run four times a day with each update forecasting out to 16 days. With the new GFS, the model delivers hourly forecast guidance out to five days, instead of every three hours as before. Hourly forecasts will help forecasters better predict the onset of a storm and critical details of its evolution, which will be particularly helpful to decision-makers, emergency managers and commuters in preparation for morning and evening rush-hour. Hourly output has also allowed for new and improved icing information for the aviation community.
This upgrade also prepares the GFS to make use of highly anticipated satellite observations from JPSS and GOES-R. GOES-R is scheduled to launch later this year and will provide images of weather patterns and severe storms as frequently as every 30 seconds, which will contribute to more accurate and reliable weather forecasts and severe weather outlooks.
NOAA's Global Forecast System model visualized on NOAA’s Science on a Sphere. Gray, blue and white colors depict moisture in the atmosphere on May 11, 2016, over North America. More information: http://sos.noaa.gov/What_is_SOS/index.html
NOAA's GFS model visualized on NOAA’s Science On a Sphere
Today’s improvements will allow for hundreds of thousands more earth observations from these satellites and other observations to inform GFS model output. For example, using satellite radiance information the new GFS can collect and ingest observations in both clear and cloudy sky conditions. In addition, the new GFS will make weather observations from commercial aircraft more reliable by filtering out poor data points and correcting biases.
When tested, the new GFS improved forecasts over grass and cropland in the Great Plains to more readily identify instability in the atmosphere that could lead to severe thunderstorms and tornadoes. The upgrade also improved precipitation forecasts for the continental U.S., and better predicted the development, track and intensity of tropical storms.
NOAA’s weather and climate models, including the GFS, are free and available to the public.
NOAA’s mission is to understand and predict changes in the Earth's environment, from the depths of the ocean to the surface of the sun, and to conserve and manage our coastal and marine resources. Join us on Twitter,Facebook, Instagram, and our other social media channels.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)